Skip to content
Oil Change International | Data Driven, People Powered. Oil Change International | Data Driven, People Powered.
  • About
    • Our Work
    • Values
    • Team
    • Jobs at OCI
    • Ways to Give
  • Program Areas
    • Africa
    • Asia
    • North Sea
    • United States
    • Global Industry
    • Global Public Finance
    • Global Policy
  • Blog
  • Press Releases
  • Publications
Donate
  • Get Updates
    • Share on Bluesky Share on Bluesky Bluesky (opens in a new window)
    • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter Twitter (opens in a new window)
    • Share on Instagram Share on Instagram Instagram (opens in a new window)
    • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn LinkedIn (opens in a new window)
    • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook Facebook (opens in a new window)
Donate
  • About
    • Our Work
    • Values
    • Team
    • Jobs at OCI
    • Ways to Give
  • Program Areas
    • Africa
    • Asia
    • North Sea
    • United States
    • Global Industry
    • Global Public Finance
    • Global Policy
  • Blog
  • Press Releases
  • Publications
    • Get Updates
    • Share on Bluesky Bluesky
    • Share on Twitter Twitter
    • Share on Instagram Instagram
    • Share on LinkedIn LinkedIn
    • Share on Facebook Facebook
Go to OCI Homepage
Current Affairs
Published: November 05, 2009

IEA to Reduce Oil Demand Forecasts Again

  • Latest from OCI
  • Blogs listing
  • IEA to Reduce Oil Demand Forecasts Again
    • Current Affairs LNG oil demand Oil industry tar sands
Andy Rowell

When not blogging for OCI, Andy is a freelance writer and journalist specializing in environmental issues.

[email protected]

oil-demandThe tar sands may be doomed. Two of the key arguments against exploiting it are gaining traction, and both may be enough to scupper investment.

Yesterday I blogged about how the idea of a carbon-constrained world, which could fatally undermine tar sands extraction, was beginning to be debated in the mainstream press: the message being a global carbon market could seriously undermine the tar sands.

The other squeeze on the industry is coming from reduced demand and that idea that is also gaining traction. Back in August I blogged about a briefing issued by Greenpeace, Platform and Oil Change International that explored the concept of the peak demand.

As the briefing paper pointed out the expense of bringing unconventional oil to market means “that the sustained oil price needed to do so is dangerously close to a ‘break point’ price beyond which oil demand is constrained via changes in consumer behaviour and reduced economic growth.

But it is not just NGOs that are issuing a demand-side warning. Last month I blogged about how the respected oil analysts IHS Cambridge Energy Research Associates had said that oil demand in developed countries peaked in 2005.

And now according to press reports, the global energy watch-dog, the International Energy Agency will make a “substantial” downward revision to its long-term forecast for global oil demand next week.

Why this is important is that this is the second year running the IEA has slashed its view of the world’s thirst for oil.

According to the IEA “demand-management policies” are having more impact than previously expected in the developed world, which accounts for about 55% of world oil consumption.

A drop in industrial activity from the recession is also a big factor in the revision.

Philip Verleger, a veteran independent energy economist based in Colorado, told the Wall Street Journal that “The rise in global oil consumption over the next 10 years could be minimal,” says Mr. Verleger.

The slowly demand means that ther will be a “gas glut”, according to other leaked drafts of the IEA’s report. The IEA says that “global gas markets have evolved from a seller’s market, driven by tight supply and demand, to a buyer’s market as demand weakens while new supply comes on stream”.

The draft of the report states: “Projected global demand points to significant underutilisation of inter-regional pipeline and LNG capacity around the world. “This looming glut could have far-reaching effects on gas pricing.”

For companies like Shell this could spell real trouble: it is investing heavily in tar sands and LNG. Both investments could be heading for the rocks.

Oil Change International | Data Driven, People Powered.
Donate Get Updates
Back to the top
  • Keep in touch

  • Oil Change International
    714 G St. SE, #202
    Washington, DC 20003
    United States

    +1.202.518.9029

    [email protected]

    • Share on Bluesky Bluesky (opens in a new window)
    • Share on Twitter Twitter (opens in a new window)
    • Share on Instagram Instagram (opens in a new window)
    • Share on LinkedIn LinkedIn (opens in a new window)
    • Share on Facebook Facebook (opens in a new window)
  • Quick links

  • About OCI
  • Our Values
  • Jobs at OCI
  • Ways to Give
  • Media Centre

  • Publications
  • Press
  • Associated websites

  • Big Oil Reality Check
  • Energy Finance Database
  • Permian Climate Bomb
  • Site map
  • Privacy policy

Copyright © 2025 Oil Change International. Web design by Fat Beehive