Skip to content
Oil Change International | Data Driven, People Powered.
  • About
    • Our Work
    • Values
    • Team
    • Jobs at OCI
    • Ways to Give
  • Program Areas
    • Africa
    • Asia
    • North Sea
    • United States
    • Global Industry
    • Global Public Finance
    • Global Policy
  • Latest
    • Blog
    • Podcast
    • Press Releases
    • Shell Shocked Land
  • Press Releases
  • Publications
Donate
  • Get Updates
    • Bluesky (opens in a new window)
    • Twitter (opens in a new window)
    • Instagram (opens in a new window)
    • LinkedIn (opens in a new window)
    • Facebook (opens in a new window)
Donate
  • About
    • Our Work
    • Values
    • Team
    • Jobs at OCI
    • Ways to Give
  • Program Areas
    • Africa
    • Asia
    • North Sea
    • United States
    • Global Industry
    • Global Public Finance
    • Global Policy
  • Latest
    • Blog
    • Podcast
    • Press Releases
    • Shell Shocked Land
  • Press Releases
  • Publications
    • Get Updates
    • Share on Bluesky Bluesky
    • Share on Twitter Twitter
    • Share on Instagram Instagram
    • Share on LinkedIn LinkedIn
    • Share on Facebook Facebook
Go to OCI Homepage
Current Affairs
Published: October 31, 2007

US: Oil Sands are “Threat Number One”

  • Latest from OCI
  • Blogs listing
  • US: Oil Sands are “Threat Number One”
    • Climate impacts Current Affairs extreme energy Oil Shale tar sands
Andy Rowell

When not blogging for OCI, Andy is a freelance writer and journalist specializing in environmental issues.

[email protected]

Anyone who read yesterday’s blog on oil sands will know it’s a fuel with serious ecological and social problems. Well, Canadian oil sands producers should brace for further bad news – this time from south of the border.

David Pumphrey, a former official in the Department of Energy and now a senior fellow at the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, said that increasingly oil sands are seen as “threat No. 1” in North America’s growing battle against greenhouse gas emissions.

Pumphrey said there are more than a half-dozen bills before Congress that would introduce a national system to cap greenhouse gas emissions and establish a market for emissions credits. Several of those bills would “penalize” energy sources like Alberta’s oil sands, which produce far more carbon dioxide emissions than conventional, lighter crude, he said.

The climate change challenge is only one of several “above ground risks” facing the oil sands projects, which nonetheless represent a promising source of additional crude oil for North American markets, the conference heard. Matthew McManus, an energy official in the State Department, said the U.S. perceives the Canadian oil and gas sector as one of “near zero political risk” and enormous investment opportunity.

For an industry that is meant to specialize in the long-term this is a no-brainer. If near zero political risk equates to huge and potentially catastrophic ecological risk, then that in turn will lead to increased political risk. This stuff ain’t rocket science.


Oil Change International | Data Driven, People Powered.
Donate Get Updates
Back to the top
  • Keep in touch
  • Oil Change International
    714 G St. SE, #202
    Washington, DC 20003
    United States

    +1.202.518.9029

    [email protected]

    • Bluesky (opens in a new window)
    • Twitter (opens in a new window)
    • Instagram (opens in a new window)
    • LinkedIn (opens in a new window)
    • Facebook (opens in a new window)
  • Quick links
  • About OCI
  • Our Values
  • Jobs at OCI
  • Ways to Give
  • Media Centre
  • Publications
  • Press
  • Associated websites
  • Big Oil Reality Check
  • Energy Finance Database
  • Permian Climate Bomb
  • Site map
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility statement

Copyright © 2026 Oil Change International. Web design by Fat Beehive