Skip to content
Oil Change International | Data Driven, People Powered. Oil Change International | Data Driven, People Powered.
  • About
    • Our Work
    • Values
    • Team
    • Jobs at OCI
    • Ways to Give
  • Program Areas
    • Africa
    • Asia
    • North Sea
    • United States
    • Global Industry
    • Global Public Finance
    • Global Policy
  • Blog
  • Press Releases
  • Publications
Donate
  • Get Updates
    • Share on Bluesky Share on Bluesky Bluesky (opens in a new window)
    • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter Twitter (opens in a new window)
    • Share on Instagram Share on Instagram Instagram (opens in a new window)
    • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn LinkedIn (opens in a new window)
    • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook Facebook (opens in a new window)
Donate
  • About
    • Our Work
    • Values
    • Team
    • Jobs at OCI
    • Ways to Give
  • Program Areas
    • Africa
    • Asia
    • North Sea
    • United States
    • Global Industry
    • Global Public Finance
    • Global Policy
  • Blog
  • Press Releases
  • Publications
    • Get Updates
    • Share on Bluesky Bluesky
    • Share on Twitter Twitter
    • Share on Instagram Instagram
    • Share on LinkedIn LinkedIn
    • Share on Facebook Facebook
Go to OCI Homepage
Current Affairs
Published: February 19, 2013

The Missing Tar Sands Monitoring Data

A year after the the Canadians launched a monitoring programme for the tar sands, no data has been released.

  • Latest from OCI
  • Blogs listing
  • The Missing Tar Sands Monitoring Data
    • Blog Post Canada Current Affairs Featured Pollution tar sands
Andy Rowell

When not blogging for OCI, Andy is a freelance writer and journalist specializing in environmental issues.

[email protected]

Greenpeace

As they have toured Europe and America trying to promote the tar sands, Canadian and Albertan politicians have always touted that they are improving the environmental impact of their dirty product.

Part of improving the impact has been setting up a supposedly world-class monitoring programme.

For example in July last year, documents released in the UK under Freedom of Information reveal the extract of an email between Tony Kay the British Consul General in Calgary and Alison Redford, the Albertan Premier.  Redford argued that a new “quasi-independent monitoring project would imminently publish a strategy for providing robust and scientific data.”

Could this be yet more empty promises, because the Canadian press is reporting that nearly a year after the Albertan and Federal government unveiled a three-year plan to increase the monitoring of the tar sands, there are still no formal public results.

The plan was meant to include monthly water testing. It was also meant to publicly produce data before the end of 2012.

But a year after the original plan was launched and weeks after the deadline, no data has been released. “We’re not yet at a stage where we can release the data and say ‘here is what we currently know’,” Karen Dodds, assistant deputy minister of Environment Canada’s science and technology branch told CBC Canada.

Dodds said some data might be produced by the end of the month, although “no date has been made final.”

The Canadians are still wrangling over money about who will pick up the bill. Although the industry has agreed to pay a maximum of $50 million a year for the monitoring, so far there is no governance structure to collect the money.

The respected Pembina Institute is now arguing that without the data being released further permits on tar sands development should not be released.

Meanwhile the need for detailed monitoring is laid bare by a memo published by Postmedia news, which reveals that tailings ponds from the tar sands are leaking and contaminating Alberta’s groundwater.

The memo, written for Canadian Natural Resources Minister Joe Oliver in June last year, warned that “studies have for the first time, detected harmful, mining-related organic acid contaminants in the groundwater outside a long-established out-of-pit tailings pond” .

The memo continued that “substantial levels of mining-related organic acids” were detected up to 1.6 km from a tailings pond.

The memo also reveals the “holding media lines” to take about releasing the information, one of which is that “this study is an example of the Government of Canada’s commitment to strengthening environmental review and protection”. Another would be releasing all monitoring data immediately.

And then comes the more difficult one about talking about tar sands disinvestment, rather than re-investment.

Oil Change International | Data Driven, People Powered.
Donate Get Updates
Back to the top
  • Keep in touch

  • Oil Change International
    714 G St. SE, #202
    Washington, DC 20003
    United States

    +1.202.518.9029

    [email protected]

    • Share on Bluesky Bluesky (opens in a new window)
    • Share on Twitter Twitter (opens in a new window)
    • Share on Instagram Instagram (opens in a new window)
    • Share on LinkedIn LinkedIn (opens in a new window)
    • Share on Facebook Facebook (opens in a new window)
  • Quick links

  • About OCI
  • Our Values
  • Jobs at OCI
  • Ways to Give
  • Media Centre

  • Publications
  • Press
  • Associated websites

  • Big Oil Reality Check
  • Energy Finance Database
  • Permian Climate Bomb
  • Site map
  • Privacy policy

Copyright © 2025 Oil Change International. Web design by Fat Beehive