Skip to content
Oil Change International | Data Driven, People Powered. Oil Change International | Data Driven, People Powered.
  • About
    • Our Work
    • Values
    • Team
    • Jobs at OCI
    • Ways to Give
  • Program Areas
    • Africa
    • Asia
    • North Sea
    • United States
    • Global Industry
    • Global Public Finance
    • Global Policy
  • Blog
  • Press Releases
  • Publications
Donate
  • Get Updates
    • Share on Bluesky Share on Bluesky Bluesky (opens in a new window)
    • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter Twitter (opens in a new window)
    • Share on Instagram Share on Instagram Instagram (opens in a new window)
    • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn LinkedIn (opens in a new window)
    • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook Facebook (opens in a new window)
Donate
  • About
    • Our Work
    • Values
    • Team
    • Jobs at OCI
    • Ways to Give
  • Program Areas
    • Africa
    • Asia
    • North Sea
    • United States
    • Global Industry
    • Global Public Finance
    • Global Policy
  • Blog
  • Press Releases
  • Publications
    • Get Updates
    • Share on Bluesky Bluesky
    • Share on Twitter Twitter
    • Share on Instagram Instagram
    • Share on LinkedIn LinkedIn
    • Share on Facebook Facebook
Go to OCI Homepage
Current Affairs
Published: April 01, 2013

Two Spills in Two Days

  • Latest from OCI
  • Blogs listing
  • Two Spills in Two Days
    • Blog Post Current Affairs Featured Keystone XL oil spills pipelines Pollution tar sands
Andy Rowell

When not blogging for OCI, Andy is a freelance writer and journalist specializing in environmental issues.

[email protected]

In the raging Keystone XL debate in the US, there is an ongoing discussion as to whether it is better and safer to transport oil by rail or road.

The State Department has argued that if the KXL pipeline does not go ahead, it will not stop the tar sands from being developed, as the toxic fuel will just be transported by rail instead.

Many people believe this argument is fundamentally flawed, as the only option for the climate is to leave the tar sands in the ground.

The climate debate aside, you would have thought that the oil industry would have been keeping its head down right now, and not go spilling a drop of oil to give it the best case for arguing for KXL and how it can operate responsibly and safely.

If that is the case, then it is not doing a great job at all. On either rail or road.

Last Wednesday, a mile-long train transporting oil from Canada derailed, spilling 30,000 gallons of crude in western Minnesota.  Reuters reported that it was unclear if the oil was from Canada’s tar sands or from conventional oil fields.

In the light of the incident, some experts were arguing that oil-by-rail carries a higher risk of accidents and spills.  “It is good business for the rails and bad safety for the public,” said Jim Hall, a former chairman of the National Transportation Safety Board. “The safest form of transport for this type of product is a pipeline.”

Hey, not so fast there Jim. Not to be outdone in incompetence, on Friday, ExxonMobil’s Pegasus pipeline ruptured in what the authorities are calling a “major spill”, leaking an estimated 84,000 gallons of oil into the Central Arkansas town of Mayflower, about 25 miles north of Little Rock. This pipeline does carry the tar sands to the refineries of Texas.

Youtube video’s show oil flowing down a suburban street.  It caused at least twenty homes to be evacuated, with some residents expected not to be able to return for “at least a week”.

Luckily it seems a major environmental disaster has been narrowly avoided, as the same pipeline carries tar sands across 13 miles of the Lake Mamelle watershed as well as crossing the local Maumelle River three times. Moreover, by luck the oil had not reached the nearby Lake Conway.

The incident once again shows the fragility of the U.S. pipeline network and the inherent dangers of transporting more crude by KXL.  “This latest pipeline incident is a troubling reminder that oil companies still have not proven that they can safely transport Canadian tar sands oil across the United States without creating risks to our citizens and our environment,” said Rep Edward J. Markey, the ranking Democrat on the House Natural Resources Committee.

So once again forgetting the climate arguments, purely on safety grounds it looks like KXL should be rejected. The oil industry cannot be trusted with running its current pipeline network, let alone with building a new one.

Oil Change International | Data Driven, People Powered.
Donate Get Updates
Back to the top
  • Keep in touch

  • Oil Change International
    714 G St. SE, #202
    Washington, DC 20003
    United States

    +1.202.518.9029

    [email protected]

    • Share on Bluesky Bluesky (opens in a new window)
    • Share on Twitter Twitter (opens in a new window)
    • Share on Instagram Instagram (opens in a new window)
    • Share on LinkedIn LinkedIn (opens in a new window)
    • Share on Facebook Facebook (opens in a new window)
  • Quick links

  • About OCI
  • Our Values
  • Jobs at OCI
  • Ways to Give
  • Media Centre

  • Publications
  • Press
  • Associated websites

  • Big Oil Reality Check
  • Energy Finance Database
  • Permian Climate Bomb
  • Site map
  • Privacy policy

Copyright © 2025 Oil Change International. Web design by Fat Beehive