Skip to content
Oil Change International | Data Driven, People Powered. Oil Change International | Data Driven, People Powered.
  • About
    • Our Work
    • Values
    • Team
    • Jobs at OCI
    • Ways to Give
  • Program Areas
    • Africa
    • Asia
    • North Sea
    • United States
    • Global Industry
    • Global Public Finance
    • Global Policy
  • Blog
  • Press Releases
  • Publications
Donate
  • Get Updates
    • Share on Bluesky Share on Bluesky Bluesky (opens in a new window)
    • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter Twitter (opens in a new window)
    • Share on Instagram Share on Instagram Instagram (opens in a new window)
    • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn LinkedIn (opens in a new window)
    • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook Facebook (opens in a new window)
Donate
  • About
    • Our Work
    • Values
    • Team
    • Jobs at OCI
    • Ways to Give
  • Program Areas
    • Africa
    • Asia
    • North Sea
    • United States
    • Global Industry
    • Global Public Finance
    • Global Policy
  • Blog
  • Press Releases
  • Publications
    • Get Updates
    • Share on Bluesky Bluesky
    • Share on Twitter Twitter
    • Share on Instagram Instagram
    • Share on LinkedIn LinkedIn
    • Share on Facebook Facebook
Go to OCI Homepage
Published: April 06, 2006

BP’s Arctic Troubles Mount

  • Latest from OCI
  • Blogs listing
  • BP’s Arctic Troubles Mount
    • extreme energy Health and Safety Oil Politics Pollution

For years oil analyst-turned whistleblower, Chuck Hamel, has been saying that the oil company operations in Alaska are a sham. He has become a conduit for whistleblowers working on the North Slope and for Alyeska -the joint pipeline company.

They have bought to him information concerning corrosion, quality assurance, health and safety and many other issues. Basically Hamel’s message has been that it is a disaster waiting to happen. The oil industry has routinely dismissed Hamel’s concerns, but for how much longer?

In March corrosion caused a leak in a BP pipeline that went unnoticed for five days, causing the largest ever spill on the North Slope. An investigation into the spill by the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation could result in fines against BP of more than $2 million (euro1.63 million)

The company is also under criminal investigation by officials at the Environmental Protection Agency, who were already investigating BP when the March spill happened. According to the Wall Street Journal: “If investigators find any violations of the Clean Water Act, they will likely discuss the case with the U.S. attorney’s office, which could forward the matter to a federal grand jury for possible prosecution, said a person familiar with the matter”.

Now a senior financial analyst at Alyeska has filed a complaint with US federal Labour officials alleging that he was fired by Alyeska in retaliation for co-operating with criminal investigators from the EPA. The analyst Glen Plumlee, says he was asked to falsify records on corrosion, the very issue that caused BP’s latest spill. BP is the majority partner in Alyeska.

You know what they say – you can only hide the truth for so long …

Oil Change International | Data Driven, People Powered.
Donate Get Updates
Back to the top
  • Keep in touch

  • Oil Change International
    714 G St. SE, #202
    Washington, DC 20003
    United States

    +1.202.518.9029

    [email protected]

    • Share on Bluesky Bluesky (opens in a new window)
    • Share on Twitter Twitter (opens in a new window)
    • Share on Instagram Instagram (opens in a new window)
    • Share on LinkedIn LinkedIn (opens in a new window)
    • Share on Facebook Facebook (opens in a new window)
  • Quick links

  • About OCI
  • Our Values
  • Jobs at OCI
  • Ways to Give
  • Media Centre

  • Publications
  • Press
  • Associated websites

  • Big Oil Reality Check
  • Energy Finance Database
  • Permian Climate Bomb
  • Site map
  • Privacy policy

Copyright © 2025 Oil Change International. Web design by Fat Beehive