Skip to content
Oil Change International | Data Driven, People Powered. Oil Change International | Data Driven, People Powered.
  • About
    • Our Work
    • Values
    • Team
    • Jobs at OCI
    • Ways to Give
  • Program Areas
    • Africa
    • Asia
    • North Sea
    • United States
    • Global Industry
    • Global Public Finance
    • Global Policy
  • Blog
  • Press Releases
  • Publications
Donate
  • Get Updates
    • Share on Bluesky Share on Bluesky Bluesky (opens in a new window)
    • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter Twitter (opens in a new window)
    • Share on Instagram Share on Instagram Instagram (opens in a new window)
    • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn LinkedIn (opens in a new window)
    • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook Facebook (opens in a new window)
Donate
  • About
    • Our Work
    • Values
    • Team
    • Jobs at OCI
    • Ways to Give
  • Program Areas
    • Africa
    • Asia
    • North Sea
    • United States
    • Global Industry
    • Global Public Finance
    • Global Policy
  • Blog
  • Press Releases
  • Publications
    • Get Updates
    • Share on Bluesky Bluesky
    • Share on Twitter Twitter
    • Share on Instagram Instagram
    • Share on LinkedIn LinkedIn
    • Share on Facebook Facebook
Go to OCI Homepage
Current Affairs
Published: June 02, 2015

Newsletter: Tar sands crude-by-rail falls off a cliff

  • Latest from OCI
  • Blogs listing
  • Newsletter: Tar sands crude-by-rail falls off a cliff
    • Crude by rail Current Affairs Fossil fuel companies tar sands
Matt Maiorana

Matt is the Communications Director at Oil Change International.

[email protected]

As Kinder Morgan and Imperial Oil together opened the third tar sands unit train loading terminal in the Edmonton/Hardisty area, the business of sending tar sands crude to market by rail hit the skids.

Genscape monitors each of the three terminals and the latest figures show that two of the terminals loaded no crude whatsoever for a week, while the third loaded on only three out of seven days.

The three terminals have a combined rated loading capacity of 430,000 barrels per day (bpd) but only managed to load an average of 75,000 bpd between them over the past four weeks (see Table 1 and Figure 1).  This is about 17% of their combined capacity and equivalent to about 1.1 unit trains per day between them.[1]

Table 1: Weekly Loadings at three tar sands unit train loading terminals

Screen Shot 2015-06-02 at 2.06.18 PM

Source: Oil Change International and Genscape PetroRail Report.

Figure 1: Weekly Loadings at three tar sands unit train loading terminals

Screen Shot 2015-06-02 at 2.01.54 PM
The low rates of utilization may come as a surprise to those that have heard so much about rail offering a solution to pipeline delays. However, we have extensively documented the problems with tar sands going by rail as well as the ongoing issues at the first tar sands unit train loading terminal, Canexus Bruderheim.

The current dive in utilization at these terminals is most likely linked to the lack of profitability in sending tar sands by rail when oil prices are low and the price differential between Canadian and U.S. crudes is narrow. Both of those factors are currently in play.

Loadings may pick up when prices rise and/or the differential widens again, but this merely confirms the stopgap status of crude-by-rail for tar sands producers. When the price differential widens it supports rail use because the extra cost of using rail is absorbed into the price the crude fetches at the destination. However, that does little to improve the netback (profit) for tar sands producers who will either have to sell at the loading end at a discount or pay the high cost of rail to sell at the destination and realize the higher price.

As the CEO of Imperial said when he announced the opening of the latest tar sands unit train terminal in Edmonton, “the jury is still out” on how much tar sands crude rail will ship by rail. If recent weeks are anything to judge by, the jury may have an answer.

—
[1] This assumes heavy oil loads at 550 barrels per tank car and 120 cars per train (66,000 barrels per train).

Oil Change International | Data Driven, People Powered.
Donate Get Updates
Back to the top
  • Keep in touch

  • Oil Change International
    714 G St. SE, #202
    Washington, DC 20003
    United States

    +1.202.518.9029

    [email protected]

    • Share on Bluesky Bluesky (opens in a new window)
    • Share on Twitter Twitter (opens in a new window)
    • Share on Instagram Instagram (opens in a new window)
    • Share on LinkedIn LinkedIn (opens in a new window)
    • Share on Facebook Facebook (opens in a new window)
  • Quick links

  • About OCI
  • Our Values
  • Jobs at OCI
  • Ways to Give
  • Media Centre

  • Publications
  • Press
  • Associated websites

  • Big Oil Reality Check
  • Energy Finance Database
  • Permian Climate Bomb
  • Site map
  • Privacy policy

Copyright © 2025 Oil Change International. Web design by Fat Beehive