The New Dirty Energy Money Champions
Ever heard of the National Rural Electric Cooperative Association?
We didn’t know much about them either. But they have popped up on our radar as an organisation that is pouring millions into politics.
So we started doing some digging. NRECA calls itself the national service organisations that represents the nation’s more than 900 private, not-for-profit, consumer-owned electric cooperatives, which provide service to 42 million people in 47 states.
Log onto its website and it will tell you that its members promote community cohesion and activism, improved infrastructure, industry, education, health service, community facilities, and housing while reducing crime.
Sounds all good. Doesn’t it. Sounds very Mom and Pop. It goes with their cartoon character, Willie Wiredhand who is the longtime friendly face and spokesplug of rural electric cooperatives across the US.
But there is a hidden side of the NRECA:
A new analysis by Oil Change International has found that the NRECA is now the biggest contributor of DirtyEnergyMoney to politicians. The Association has given a massive $8,054,411 over the last decade, and $1.5 million just in the last election cycle .
To put this into perspective this is more than double the 737 thousand dollars that the Koch Brothers gave in the last cycle.
Rural Electric Cooperatives which NRECA represents rely on coal for 80% of their power generation;
The NRECA has attacked the Environmental Protection Agency and its efforts to use the Clean Air Act to regulate carbon emissions “It is the responsibility of Congress to decide this issue, not the Environmental Protection Agency.”
Last week, one of NRECA’s members, Mark Bailey, the president and CEO of Big Rivers Electric Corporation testified before Congress. Big Rivers is reliant on coal for a whopping 97 per cent of its electricity. He attacked the EPA’s moves to control pollution and carbon dioxide.
Bailey said: “I believe the future impact of the EPA’s proposed regulations will ultimately increase electric costs, could effect reliability, reduce employment and weaken the global competitiveness of the American manufacturing industry. The combined environmental regulations will force us and other electric utilities to decide whether to retire coal fired plants, switch fuels, or install expensive control equipment to meet the environmental regulations.”
In March 2011, the NRECA backed Congress’s leading climate sceptic’ James Inhofe’s “Energy Tax Prevention Act of 2011,” which would prevent the Environmental Protection Agency from using the Clean Air Act to regulate greenhouse gases.
It is opposing a Google-backed effort to build a $5 billion undersea power line supporting wind energy from New Jersey to Virginia.
In 2008, the NRECA backed the coal-industry astroturf front group, the Americans for Balanced Energy Choices, accused of running a disinformation campaign on climate change.
In 2006, the NRECA member the Intermountain Rural Electric Association (IREA) paid known climate sceptic Patrick Michaels $100,000 and then sent a nine-page memo to the 900 members of the NRECA, asking for their help in disseminating information in a six-page “fact sheet” that claimed to refute the dangers of climate change.
Scientists criticized the IREA for misrepresenting the scientific evidence of climate change in the fact sheet by attributing it to natural cycles and “the influences of plate tectonics.”
“There is clearly a well-organized and well-funded effort to undermine the science and cause confusion in the minds of the public,” said Kevin Trenberth, a climate scientist at the National Center for Atmospheric Research in Boulder, Colorado.
Hardly Mom and Pop behavior really…