Skip to content
Oil Change International | Data Driven, People Powered. Oil Change International | Data Driven, People Powered.
  • About
    • Our Work
    • Values
    • Team
    • Jobs at OCI
    • Ways to Give
  • Program Areas
    • Africa
    • Asia
    • North Sea
    • United States
    • Global Industry
    • Global Public Finance
    • Global Policy
  • Blog
  • Press Releases
  • Publications
Donate
  • Get Updates
    • Share on Bluesky Share on Bluesky Bluesky (opens in a new window)
    • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter Twitter (opens in a new window)
    • Share on Instagram Share on Instagram Instagram (opens in a new window)
    • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn LinkedIn (opens in a new window)
    • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook Facebook (opens in a new window)
Donate
  • About
    • Our Work
    • Values
    • Team
    • Jobs at OCI
    • Ways to Give
  • Program Areas
    • Africa
    • Asia
    • North Sea
    • United States
    • Global Industry
    • Global Public Finance
    • Global Policy
  • Blog
  • Press Releases
  • Publications
    • Get Updates
    • Share on Bluesky Bluesky
    • Share on Twitter Twitter
    • Share on Instagram Instagram
    • Share on LinkedIn LinkedIn
    • Share on Facebook Facebook
Go to OCI Homepage
Current Affairs
Published: April 17, 2012

Its Official: Fracking Causes Quakes

  • Latest from OCI
  • Blogs listing
  • Its Official: Fracking Causes Quakes
    • Blog Post Carbon emissions Climate change Current Affairs Featured Fracking Shale Gas
Andy Rowell

When not blogging for OCI, Andy is a freelance writer and journalist specializing in environmental issues.

[email protected]

An independent report commissioned by the British government has confirmed that the controversial drill technique known as fracking did cause two small earthquakes, near Lancaster in North West England last year.

The company concerned, Cuadrilla, halted fracking after two minor quakes were recorded in April and May, with magnitudes of 2.3 and 1.5 respectively.

The report, written by independent experts and scientists, concludes that “the earthquake activity was caused by direct fluid injection” during the fracking treatment.

However the report then argues that “the probability of further earthquake activity is low”. But one of the report’s authors, Peter Styles from Keele University concedes “we believe it’s not possible to categorically reject the possibility of further quakes.”

Despite these risks, the experts then recommend that fracking can be extended throughout the UK.

However it does called for tighter regulation and monitoring, arguing that it “should include a smaller pre-injection and monitoring stage”, something which did not take place at the existing sites.

The report also makes four recommends that all injections of fracking fluid must include a preliminary injection, followed by monitoring; that the growth of fractures in the shale should be monitored; that operations should monitor seismic events in real time and finally that operators should observe a “traffic light” regime, with quakes of magnitude 0.5 or above triggering a “red light” and an immediate halt, followed by remedial action.

The government is now going to consult on the report for six weeks, but commentators feel that it gives the green light for fracking expansion in the UK.

Mark Miller, Cuadrilla’s chief executive, welcomed the report. “We are pleased that the experts have come to a clear conclusion that it is safe to allow us to resume hydraulic fracturing, following the procedures outlined in the review,” he said.

Morever, as Damian Carrington points out on his blog this morning “The report fails to put to bed all concerns over seismic safety. But more importantly the crowded island we inhabit is very different to the wide open spaces of America, even if the gas fracker’s heroic guesses on how much gas may be under our feet turn out to be correct.”

This report only looked at seismic activity and not groundwater contamination. There is also an ongoing debate about how clean fracking is due to the leakage of methane. There is increasing evidence that shale gas could be dirtier than coal.

Another recent scientific paper also concluded that that current leakage rates of methane from natural gas “are higher than previously thought.”

If this report gives the green light to shale gas drilling in the UK, it will also delay the shift to a clean energy future.

Oil Change International | Data Driven, People Powered.
Donate Get Updates
Back to the top
  • Keep in touch

  • Oil Change International
    714 G St. SE, #202
    Washington, DC 20003
    United States

    +1.202.518.9029

    [email protected]

    • Share on Bluesky Bluesky (opens in a new window)
    • Share on Twitter Twitter (opens in a new window)
    • Share on Instagram Instagram (opens in a new window)
    • Share on LinkedIn LinkedIn (opens in a new window)
    • Share on Facebook Facebook (opens in a new window)
  • Quick links

  • About OCI
  • Our Values
  • Jobs at OCI
  • Ways to Give
  • Media Centre

  • Publications
  • Press
  • Associated websites

  • Big Oil Reality Check
  • Energy Finance Database
  • Permian Climate Bomb
  • Site map
  • Privacy policy

Copyright © 2025 Oil Change International. Web design by Fat Beehive