Skip to content
Oil Change International | Data Driven, People Powered. Oil Change International | Data Driven, People Powered.
  • About
    • Our Work
    • Values
    • Team
    • Jobs at OCI
    • Ways to Give
  • Program Areas
    • Africa
    • Asia
    • North Sea
    • United States
    • Global Industry
    • Global Public Finance
    • Global Policy
  • Blog
  • Press Releases
  • Publications
Donate
  • Get Updates
    • Share on Bluesky Share on Bluesky Bluesky (opens in a new window)
    • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter Twitter (opens in a new window)
    • Share on Instagram Share on Instagram Instagram (opens in a new window)
    • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn LinkedIn (opens in a new window)
    • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook Facebook (opens in a new window)
Donate
  • About
    • Our Work
    • Values
    • Team
    • Jobs at OCI
    • Ways to Give
  • Program Areas
    • Africa
    • Asia
    • North Sea
    • United States
    • Global Industry
    • Global Public Finance
    • Global Policy
  • Blog
  • Press Releases
  • Publications
    • Get Updates
    • Share on Bluesky Bluesky
    • Share on Twitter Twitter
    • Share on Instagram Instagram
    • Share on LinkedIn LinkedIn
    • Share on Facebook Facebook
Go to OCI Homepage
Current Affairs
Published: November 18, 2015

Now Statoil Pulls Out of Alaska

There was more good news from the Arctic yesterday, when Norwegian oil company Statoil announced it was “exiting” the region, following recent exploration results in neighbouring oil and gas leases.

  • Latest from OCI
  • Blogs listing
  • Now Statoil Pulls Out of Alaska
    • Arctic Oil and Gas Current Affairs Fossil fuel companies offshore drilling Shell
Andy Rowell

When not blogging for OCI, Andy is a freelance writer and journalist specializing in environmental issues.

[email protected]

Arctic - ObamaThere was more good news from the Arctic yesterday, when Norwegian oil company Statoil announced it was “exiting” the region, following recent exploration results in neighbouring oil and gas leases.

In a statement the company said that its leases in the “Chukchi Sea are no longer considered competitive within Statoil’s global portfolio, so the decision has been made to exit the leases and close the office in Anchorage, Alaska.”

This is a significant retreat. The company has been operating in the Alaskan Arctic since 2008. Statoil will exit 16 leases which it operates itself, as well as 50 leases operated by ConocoPhillips, all in the Chukchi Sea.

The company’s executive Vice President for exploration, Tim Dodson, said in a statement that “given the current outlook we could not support continued efforts to mature these opportunities.”

Statoil’s awarded leases were located some 37 miles north of Shell’s Burger gas discovery, which the UK oil giant abandoned in September this year.  Last month both Statoil and Shell applied for lease suspensions, although this was refused.

Big Oil’s supporters are worried. US senator Lisa Murkowski, one of the industry’s most ardent supporters, has expressed her concern that “for the second time in as many months, a major company has decided to walk away from Alaska because of the uncertainty surrounding our federal government’s support for Arctic development.”

She attacked the Obama Administration for the Statoil’s retreat. Although low oil prices may have contributed to Statoil’s decision, she said, “the real project killer was this administration’s refusal to grant lease extensions; its imposition of a complicated, drawn-out, and ever-changing regulatory process; and its cancellation of future lease sales that have stifled energy production in Alaska. These actions threaten to undermine Alaska’s economy, our security, and our environment.”

Quite how Big Oil retreating from the Arctic is somehow a threat to the environment is beyond me.

Environmental groups naturally welcomed the move. “First Shell and now Statoil abandoning offshore leases sends a strong message to decision makers meeting in Paris next month” Susan Murray, a deputy vice president of Oceana, said. “Pursuing oil and gas in the U.S. Arctic Ocean is too risky and expensive for both the environment and companies’ economic portfolios.”

She added: “The global threats imposed by climate change require that decisions made about important Arctic Ocean resources apply careful planning, precaution, and science to ensure a sustainable future for the Arctic and, in turn, our planet.”

Indeed, yesterday a group of environmental groups, including OCI, started pushing out adverts (see image) calling on Obama to permanently ban Arctic drilling in the run up to the Paris climate meeting.

The message to the President is simple: Stop Arctic drilling once and for all.

Oil Change International | Data Driven, People Powered.
Donate Get Updates
Back to the top
  • Keep in touch

  • Oil Change International
    714 G St. SE, #202
    Washington, DC 20003
    United States

    +1.202.518.9029

    [email protected]

    • Share on Bluesky Bluesky (opens in a new window)
    • Share on Twitter Twitter (opens in a new window)
    • Share on Instagram Instagram (opens in a new window)
    • Share on LinkedIn LinkedIn (opens in a new window)
    • Share on Facebook Facebook (opens in a new window)
  • Quick links

  • About OCI
  • Our Values
  • Jobs at OCI
  • Ways to Give
  • Media Centre

  • Publications
  • Press
  • Associated websites

  • Big Oil Reality Check
  • Energy Finance Database
  • Permian Climate Bomb
  • Site map
  • Privacy policy

Copyright © 2025 Oil Change International. Web design by Fat Beehive