Data Driven, People Powered.
At Oil Change International we work to expose the true costs of fossil fuels and facilitate a just transition to clean energy. Join us.
For eight years, the International Energy Agency (IEA) has presented research indicating that oil and gas companies can reduce their prolific methane emissions cost-effectively. For eight years, oil and gas companies have failed to do so.
As Norway heads into its parliamentary election on September 8th 2025, we analysed the manifestos of all major political parties represented in Parliament to evaluate how their proposed oil and gas policies would shift Norway’s trajectory.
Wet’suwet’en First Nation hereditary leaders filed a formal complaint against the Japan Bank for International Cooperation (JBIC) for financing LNG Canada, a massive fossil gas project that depends on a pipeline built without their consent, on their unceded land. Despite these violations, the project was completed and recently began commercial operation.
A new report from Oil Change International reveals the staggering scope of federal government subsidies for fossil fuel production.
The Norwegian election is a turning point for climate and energy policy. With a Labour-led government strengthened by the Green Party (MDG) crossing the parliamentary threshold of 4% (which gives parties a larger group of MPs), there is now a real possibility of shifting away from oil and gas expansion and toward a Paris-aligned transition.
Reports state that Kemi Badenoch, leader of the Conservative Party, will pledge tomorrow at the Society of Petroleum Engineers Offshore Europe conference in Aberdeen that her party would reverse a Boris Johnson-era policy that bars UK government “financial or promotional support for the fossil fuel energy sector overseas.”
"Paying for Climate Chaos" reveals the staggering scope of federal government subsidies for fossil fuel production.
New report prepared with Analyse & Tall, reveals how Norwegian oil policy was discussed on Facebook and Instagram between January 2021 and July 2025 by politicians, parties, government bodies, environmental organizations, and oil companies.
Keir Starmer has inherited a controversial decision from Boris Johnson’s government. The UK Prime Minister must decide whether USD $1.5 billion of UK taxpayer support should be used to enable one of the most controversial infrastructure projects of modern times: The Mozambique Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) Project.
We work to advance and expand government policies to end fossil fuel production while also shifting public finance and subsidies away from fossil fuels and into a just energy transition.
The fossil fuel industry thrives on misinformation — we work to combat that misinformation, strengthen the case against false solutions, and support movement and partner coordination pushing back against oil and gas companies.
The fight for a just transition relies on strong partnerships, networks, and geographically rooted work challenging fossil fuels projects. We work to support the goals of frontline partners and help stop fossil fuel projects from being built.
The majority of global oil and gas expansion from 2023 through 2050 is threatened by just five Global North countries: the United States, Canada, Australia, Norway, and the UK.
G20 governments and development banks poured 1.4 times more public money into fossil fuels than clean energy with their international finance from 2020 to 2022.
Governments who are part of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) group of wealthy countries have an opportunity to start shifting USD $41 billion per year of public finance out of fossil fuels and into clean energy. We need these OECD countries to rewrite the rules to end export finance for new oil and gas projects.
We send emails roughly weekly, focusing on critical online actions, exploring new research, and breaking down the latest news in the climate movement.
Your gift will help us fight back against disastrous fossil fuel projects and policies. Thank you!
