Skip to content
Oil Change International | Data Driven, People Powered.
  • About
    • Our Work
    • Values
    • Team
    • Jobs at OCI
    • Ways to Give
  • Program Areas
    • Africa
    • Asia
    • North Sea
    • United States
    • Global Industry
    • Global Public Finance
    • Global Policy
  • Latest
    • Blog
    • Podcast
    • Press Releases
    • Shell Shocked Land
  • Press Releases
  • Publications
Donate
  • Get Updates
    • Bluesky (opens in a new window)
    • Twitter (opens in a new window)
    • Instagram (opens in a new window)
    • LinkedIn (opens in a new window)
    • Facebook (opens in a new window)
Donate
  • About
    • Our Work
    • Values
    • Team
    • Jobs at OCI
    • Ways to Give
  • Program Areas
    • Africa
    • Asia
    • North Sea
    • United States
    • Global Industry
    • Global Public Finance
    • Global Policy
  • Latest
    • Blog
    • Podcast
    • Press Releases
    • Shell Shocked Land
  • Press Releases
  • Publications
    • Get Updates
    • Share on Bluesky Bluesky
    • Share on Twitter Twitter
    • Share on Instagram Instagram
    • Share on LinkedIn LinkedIn
    • Share on Facebook Facebook
Go to OCI Homepage
Published: June 12, 2007

Shell Accused of “Cynical” Greenwashing

  • Latest from OCI
  • Blogs listing
  • Shell Accused of “Cynical” Greenwashing
    • Climate impacts extreme energy Greenwashing

Oil giant Shell was accused yesterday of “cynical” greenwashing for saying one thing and doing another in the fight against climate change.

At a “summit” on the issue organised by the Guardian newspaper in London, Tony Juniper, executive director of Friends of the Earth, accused Shell of sponsoring the event in a bid to align itself with green issues while failing to clean up its own act.

Shell was spending more on exploiting fossil fuels – as in its carbon-intensive tar sands operations in Canada – while failing to put out its illegal flares in Nigeria, he argued. “Shell needs to move away from PR being a term for public relations and use it for pollution reduction,” he said.

The wildlife organisation WWF also attacked Shell on its tar sand business while highlighting how its coal-to-liquid fuel technique was also carbon-intensive. “My question is where is the strategy to decrease rather than increase carbon?” asked Keith Allott, of WWF.


Oil Change International | Data Driven, People Powered.
Donate Get Updates
Back to the top
  • Keep in touch
  • Oil Change International
    714 G St. SE, #202
    Washington, DC 20003
    United States

    +1.202.518.9029

    [email protected]

    • Bluesky (opens in a new window)
    • Twitter (opens in a new window)
    • Instagram (opens in a new window)
    • LinkedIn (opens in a new window)
    • Facebook (opens in a new window)
  • Quick links
  • About OCI
  • Our Values
  • Jobs at OCI
  • Ways to Give
  • Media Centre
  • Publications
  • Press
  • Associated websites
  • Big Oil Reality Check
  • Energy Finance Database
  • Permian Climate Bomb
  • Site map
  • Privacy policy
  • Accessibility statement

Copyright © 2026 Oil Change International. Web design by Fat Beehive