Read the latest insights and analysis from the experts at Oil Change International.
They say the truth will come out. It might take years or decades, but finally the truth will eventually come out. For decades, in what has become a multi-generational fight, the communities of the Niger Delta have fought Shell for its rampant pollution and environmental devastation.
As long as the global energy system relies on volatile fossil fuel markets, conflicts will continue to drive instability, economic shocks, and corporate profiteering. Fossil fuel companies can rake in profits from this volatility, while households are left with higher bills. The only real path to energy security is a just transition to affordable renewable energy.
On 20 May 2026, the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) adopted a landmark resolution backing the International Court of Justice’s (ICJ) 2025 advisory opinion on climate change. The resolution passed overwhelmingly, with 141 countries voting in favor, 8 against, and 28 abstaining. The adoption of this resolution is a major development, both legally and politically. It reinforces States obligations under international law to prevent and address climate change and suggests that countries could face legal consequences if they fail to act, including through enabling continued fossil fuel expansion.
The Iran crisis is now exposing that vulnerability in real time, as LNG prices across Asia have nearly doubled within weeks. But this isn’t just Japan’s problem. Through years of state-backed financing, Japan has exported the same risky energy model across Southeast Asia
Trump’s illegal war with Iran has already taken a devastating human toll. It could also mean higher energy bills worldwide, while fossil fuel companies, traders and investors get rich.
Japanese-funded Batang coal power plant threatens the livelihoods of communities in Indonesia.
For eight years, the International Energy Agency (IEA) has presented research indicating that oil and gas companies can reduce their prolific methane emissions cost-effectively. For eight years, oil and gas companies have failed to do so.
Four Global North countries - the United States, Canada, Norway, and Australia - are responsible for nearly 70% of projected new oil and gas expansion from 2025 to 2035. If this oil and gas expansion is allowed to proceed, it would lock in climate chaos and an unlivable future.
Our new analysis shows many governments and finance models overstate the role the private sector can play in financing a just energy transition. This is coming to a head with the deadline for a new climate finance goal (NCQG) at COP29, where rich countries are using this outdated myth to try to get off the hook to pay their fair share for climate action.
A Norwegian oil firm's investment in controversial exploration near Botswana's Okavango Delta has sparked outrage across Scandinavia. In July 2024, the Norwegian oil and gas company BW Energy announced a partnership with the Canadian firm ReconAfrica to drill for oil in the watershed of the Kavango basin of Namibia, threatening the iconic upstream Okavango Delta of Botswana, a UNESCO World Heritage Site in Southern Africa.
