Skip to content
Oil Change International | Data Driven, People Powered. Oil Change International | Data Driven, People Powered.
  • About
    • Our Work
    • Values
    • Team
    • Jobs at OCI
    • Ways to Give
  • Program Areas
    • Africa
    • Asia
    • North Sea
    • United States
    • Global Industry
    • Global Public Finance
    • Global Policy
  • Blog
  • Press Releases
  • Publications
Donate
  • Get Updates
    • Share on Bluesky Share on Bluesky Bluesky (opens in a new window)
    • Share on Twitter Share on Twitter Twitter (opens in a new window)
    • Share on Instagram Share on Instagram Instagram (opens in a new window)
    • Share on LinkedIn Share on LinkedIn LinkedIn (opens in a new window)
    • Share on Facebook Share on Facebook Facebook (opens in a new window)
Donate
  • About
    • Our Work
    • Values
    • Team
    • Jobs at OCI
    • Ways to Give
  • Program Areas
    • Africa
    • Asia
    • North Sea
    • United States
    • Global Industry
    • Global Public Finance
    • Global Policy
  • Blog
  • Press Releases
  • Publications
    • Get Updates
    • Share on Bluesky Bluesky
    • Share on Twitter Twitter
    • Share on Instagram Instagram
    • Share on LinkedIn LinkedIn
    • Share on Facebook Facebook
Go to OCI Homepage
Current Affairs
Published: October 15, 2009

Big Oil Front Group Fights for Tar Sands

  • Latest from OCI
  • Blogs listing
  • Big Oil Front Group Fights for Tar Sands
    • Astroturfing Blog Post Canada Corporate front groups Current Affairs Public Relations tar sands
Andy Rowell

When not blogging for OCI, Andy is a freelance writer and journalist specializing in environmental issues.

[email protected]

tar-sandsThe debate on energy and climate is littered with corporate front groups scare-mongering over action on climate change at the moment.

On the blog we have recently talked about the American Petroleum Institute’s astroturf “Energy Citizen” campaign and American Coalition for Clean Coal Electricity (ACCE)’s fake letter writers.

What about the “Consumer Energy Alliance” – that “calls itself a nonprofit, nonpartisan coalition comprised of 120 affiliates and more than 180,000 grassroots.”

Actually the Alliance is a front for big oil. It comes as no surprise that affiliates to the CEA are all the big oil companies such as BP, Exxon, Conoco and Royal Dutch Shell and industry heavyweights such as the American Petroleum Institute.

Big Oil is running scared about the growing anti-tar sands campaign that is going global, so it is trying to deceive the public by using corporate front groups to fight its corner.

As the Globe and Mail pointed out this week, the “Alliance has launched a public relations and media blitz that directly challenges the environmentalists’ attacks on the Canadian oil sands.”

The CEA is trying to argue that, if the Americans don’t buy the tar sands, China will. The front group is trying to argue that there is no point in Americas opposing oil from the tar sands, because if they don’t use it “Communist China” will. At the same time it will make the US more dependent on Middle East oil.

That’s the same kind of logic as saying if I didn’t shot him, someone else would have done. It doesn’t actually make sense.

It also doesn’t factor in any conversation to renewable energy or the benefits of energy efficiency or the fact that – as we pointed out yesterday – demand for oil in the developed world has peaked.

As the Globe and Mail points out: “The campaign is part of an aggressive, multi-pronged effort by the oil industry – backed by other leading business organizations – to oppose the climate-change agenda favoured by President Barack Obama as well as the Democratic leadership, and even some Republicans, in Congress.”

As part of its pro-tar sands PR push, the Alliance is leading the fight against the low-carbon fuel standard (LCFS), a move that could threaten tar sands expansion in the US, although it has been dropped from both the House and Senate Climate bills. It is arguing that, in enacted, the LCFS “would deny millions of Americans access to Canadian energy without materially affecting global emissions of greenhouse gases.”

In reporting CEA’s antics, the Globe and Mail argues that “Big Oil” is using “Red Scare” tactics to bully America into buying “Dirty Oil”.

This is exactly what is happening.

Oil Change International | Data Driven, People Powered.
Donate Get Updates
Back to the top
  • Keep in touch

  • Oil Change International
    714 G St. SE, #202
    Washington, DC 20003
    United States

    +1.202.518.9029

    [email protected]

    • Share on Bluesky Bluesky (opens in a new window)
    • Share on Twitter Twitter (opens in a new window)
    • Share on Instagram Instagram (opens in a new window)
    • Share on LinkedIn LinkedIn (opens in a new window)
    • Share on Facebook Facebook (opens in a new window)
  • Quick links

  • About OCI
  • Our Values
  • Jobs at OCI
  • Ways to Give
  • Media Centre

  • Publications
  • Press
  • Associated websites

  • Big Oil Reality Check
  • Energy Finance Database
  • Permian Climate Bomb
  • Site map
  • Privacy policy

Copyright © 2025 Oil Change International. Web design by Fat Beehive